What legal actions can I take against someone who has defamed me online?
By
If you have been defamed online (i.e. false statements have been made about you that damage your reputation or cause injury to you), the primary legal action available to you is a civil lawsuit for defamation. A successful claim of defamation requires proof that the statement was false, published by the defendant, caused harm to the plaintiff's reputation, and either constitutes negligence on behalf of the defendant or was published with actual malice if it pertains to matters of public interest/concern. Depending on where this occurred and how much reputational damage has been done as a result, additional damages may be available such as punitive damages, special damages (economic losses resulting from reputational damage) and general damages (non-economic losses due to pain & suffering).
In addition to filing a civil lawsuit in court seeking monetary compensation for any losses incurred as a result of being defamed online, other potential remedies may include an injunction prohibiting further publication of similar statements in future or removal/correction of existing publications containing such statements. Please note that these remedies must often be obtained through specific proceedings rather than within a typical civil lawsuit for defamation - depending on jurisdiction there are typically statutory provisions allowing injunctive relief from speech-related torts like libel/slander.
Limitations: It should also be noted that certain jurisdictions provide protections against liability for third party publishers who are unable to monitor all content posted by users - section 230(c)(1) of the Communications Decency Act in particular provides immunity from liability for websites hosting user generated content unless they can be proven liable based on another form tortious activity like negligence or knowing participation in criminal activity prohibited by state law. Additionally some states recognize privilege defenses which protect parties making good faith false claims so long as they believed them at time they were uttered – this could potentially limit applicable remedy even if falsity is established since defendants would not technically bear responsibility under their own law even though their actions constituted legally recognizable harm against plaintiff’s personal property rights protected by different set laws related directly linked infringement upon right call “defamation” copyrighted material etc…
It is also important consider relevant statutes limitations when taking legal action – many jurisdictions impose strict deadlines within which suit must commenced before jurisdiction no longer viable option dispute resolution procedures case never heard normally require plaintiffs make attempts resolve issue using less expensive out court processes first file brief demonstrate informal negotiations failed “pleading” motion present evidence establishing facts required prove each element tort alternatively summary judgment used avoid trial altogether should both sides agree sufficient presented does not reasonable dispute fact pattern issue decided without ever entering courtroom . Finally there possibility award attorney fees costs favor winning litigant however it vary significantly across states so consult local regulations determine what applies particular situation .
